A relative newcomer, Doha-based Qatar Airways has drawn plenty of attention for its international service. While economy class passengers are treated to excellent in-flight service, with the airline taking out the Best First Class Airline tag, it's the first class passengers who, as usual, remain king.
Website: http://www.qatarairways.com/


A former title winner, Cathay Pacific performed well overall ranking in the top four or five positions in almost every section of the survey. The flagship carrier of Hong Kong is also one of only six airlines worldwide to carry Skytrax's prestigious five-star rating.


Jumping up from fourth position in 2006, Thai Airways came in second place overall. Famous for its in-flight service and well-dressed cabin crew, the airline also won the Best First Class Lounge award for its lounge at Bangkok Airport which includes a Royal Spa complete with sauna and yoga classes. Oh to travel first class!


No stranger to awards, Singapore Airlines snatched the overall Airline of the Year title for the quality of both its economy and premium class services. From top-notch food to friendly flight attendants, any long-haul flight on this airline, which flies more passengers every year than the entire population of Singapore, is bound to be a pleasurable experience.


The last Lufthansa Airbus A300 flight flew earlier today, as the culmination of the airline's plans to phase out the 26-strong fleet. Lufthansa flight 3853, operated by aircraft D-AIAM, left Rome and arrived in Frankfurt shortly past 9:00am local time. The A300s have been a key part of Lufthansa's 'continental' fleet since 1987, and the airline used them extensively on inter-European routes. But the A300s got the axe as part of a cost-cutting plan that Lufthansa has implemented, which is expected to save €300 million ($420 million).
American Airlines, another big A300 operator, is also expected to retire the last of its A300s this year on August 24th. Those of you who have yet to fly on an A300 (myself included) might want to look at booking tickets before it's too late...


Another aircraft retirement took place recently as UPS operated its final DC-8 flight into Louisville, KY Tuesday morning, receiving a 'water cannon salute' from fire trucks. Last month, UPS decided to accelerate the retirement of its 44-strong DC-8 fleet as a cost-cutting measure; originally, the planes were due to be phased out by 2013. Most of the airline's DC-8s were around 40 years old, and it will certainly sad to see the type go. DC-8s have been absent from scheduled passenger aviation in the US for almost twenty years now; generally speaking, many older types of planes (DC-10s, 727s) often find new lives hauling packages after they're through hauling passengers.


British Airways today posted the largest loss since it was privatized in 1987, and CEO Willie Walsh warned that he sees "no signs of recovery anywhere." "I'm 30 years in this business and I've never seen anything like this. This is by far the biggest crisis the industry has ever faced," he told CNN. The airline halted its dividend and Walsh announced that he would work without pay in July: "This is no stunt. I want to make a contribution in recognition of the extremely challenging position we face."BA's posted a net loss of £375 million ($594.6 million) for the 12 months that ended on March 31, only a year after posting a record £712 million profit a year before. Its operating loss of £220 million was compared to year-ago results of £878 million in profit. BA's full year fuel costs are near £3 billion - something that Walsh pinned the loss on, along with "reduced passenger and cargo demand."While the news of the huge loss is certainly surprising, especially in light of the fact that the airline posted record profits only last year, it wasn't altogether unexpected. BA has long been dominant in flying 'premium' passengers; some have argued that it was the airline that really made business class popular. The number of premium passengers that it flew dropped 13%, and while this number isn't far from the industry average, BA has more exposure to the premium market than other airlines; as such, it is adversely affected by the double-digit drop even more.This has meant that, over the past year, the airline has had to put volume over yields. In other words, instead of focusing on 'profit per seat' figures that are boosted by premium-paying passengers ('yield'), it's focusing on filling seats, even if those passengers filling seats are paying less. "We're now saying it's getting that balance between yield and volume so it's more a focus on volume than it has been," said Walsh, who believes that going after increased market share "is sustainable in the long term and will be profitable."BA also announced that it is still ordering the Boeing 777-300ER for delivery between 2010-12, the same time that its remaining Boeing 757-200s will leave the fleet and be replaced by aircraft in the Airbus A320 family. But BA will slash capacity by 4% next winter to reflect the lowered demand for travel as it parks 16 aircraft.


Russian carrier S7 (formerly known as Siberian Airlines) has announced today that it will officially join the oneworld alliance next year. British Airways has 'sponsored' the airline, which is Russia's largest domestic airline and a large player on international routes, too. S7 recently switched to an all-Western built fleet (no more smoky Russian jets) and is quickly expanding. Willie Walsh, CEO of British Airways, released a boilerplate statement with the usual "S7 is a perfect fit for oneworld," etc., etc., but also said that "oneworld's priority is the quality rather than quantity of member airlines." That's probably a subtle dig at oneworld rival Star Alliance, which is at least twice as large in terms of number of airlines. But perhaps when it comes to Russia, Walsh needn't be worried. The S7 announcement leaves Star as the only alliance without a significant presence in Russia (Aeroflot is a member of SkyTeam).And speaking of Star, Greek carrier Aegean Airlines will become a full member of the alliance next year.


Only a few days after arch rival British Airways posted a record loss, Virgin Atlantic Airlines announced some surprising news this week: it made a profit for the 2009 fiscal year. Even more surprisingly, pre-tax profits doubled from £34.8 million to £68.4 million ($109.3 million). And to rub it in even more to British Airways, Virgin claims that the increase in profits came from an increase in premium passengers, a demographic that BA is particularly reliant upon. Because price-cutting, Virgin was able to keep load factors in its first and business class seats solid. "We are winning market share from our competitors during the toughest trading environment ever," said CEO Steve Ridgway. "Our load factors remain resilient as travelers take advantage of these bargain fares, proving the value of vigorous competition."But Virgin's reported recent financial success isn't as simple as just an increase in passengers. Virgin Atlantic locked in its fuel prices two years ago, meaning that the airline didn't have to deal with the steep rise in prices that occurred last year. And Virgin Atlantic, unlike most of its competitors, isn't publicly listed, meaning that it doesn't have to disclose detailed financial information. The Times' Ian King notes that Virgin released the numbers two months earlier than they did last year, which "raises the suspicion that their release has been timed not only to embarrass the old enemy but also to emphasize the airline’s strength to the trade at a time when the battle for corporate clients is more ferocious than ever."While Virgin might be in a comparatively good spot right now, especially when viewed in light of British Airways' abysmal financial performance, they might not be able to keep it up for much longer. The transatlantic price war that Virgin is taking part in has started to take a toll on profits, and the state of the industry as a whole isn't solid (as Virgin's CEO has admitted). Check back in a couple of months - I'm sure that we'll see a much more subdued financial announcement from Virgin Atlantic then


United Airlines is eying a large new order for up to 150 airplanes, worth $10 billion, according to an article in the Wall Street Journal. United is apparently choosing between Boeing and Airbus, and according to the article, it's an all-or-nothing deal, meaning that purchases won't be split between the two manufactures; this way, United might be able to get a better deal. And the deal shows that United has been thinking ahead, by waiting to order until bad times for the industry. This way, the planes could be delivered starting as early as 2010, when the industry is expected to look up.The order also comes at a time when the airplane manufacturers are desperate for orders. Boeing, for example, has signed up 60 new orders so far this year, but has also lost 60. United is probably hoping that they can turn the manufacturers' desperation into their gain, in the form of lowered prices and permission to revise the order at a later date. I'm not exactly sure how United's expecting to pay for the order, especially given big losses and a pretty bad credit rating at the airline, but the article suggests that United might be seeking financing from the aircraft manufacturer, among other places. At the time of posting, United had not yet returned calls from The Airline Blog seeking comment.So what planes are going to be replaced, and with what? The airline's A319 and A320 fleets are, on average, ten years old, and they're probably not going to go anywhere anytime soon. The 737-300 and -500 fleets are much older (20 and 17 years, respectively) and are already on their way out. United's new order is probably seeking to replace the larger 757-200, 767-300, and 747-400 aircraft, and maybe some of the 777-200s too. The airline has an average fleet age of 13 years - younger than most of its rivals - but much of that is due to the relatively young age of the Airbuses. The 757s are getting pretty long in the tooth, and it wouldn't be too surprising if they were replaced with the A321 or the Boeing 737-900ER. Neither of them could completely replace the 757, though; they'd probably just be used to replace the oldest ones or to simply supplement them. The 777s aren't old, either, since the 777 itself is a pretty new aircraft model. But United, being the launch customer for the type, has some of the oldest 777s flying, and some of those are the non-extended range variety. The different versions of the 787 might be a successful replacement for both the 767 and some of the 777s; maybe the A350 would work here too. And the 747-8 (which so far only Lufthansa has signed up for) might replace some of the 747-400s.


The relationship between British Airways and Spanish carrier Iberia runs long and deep. BA owns 13.5% of Iberia and has two seats on its board, and the two airlines are members of the oneworld alliance. The airlines have been pursuing a merger for a while now, and back in February, Iberia chairman Fernando Conte said that a 'preliminary decision' on a merger would be arrived at in March. But only a few weeks ago, Spanish airline Iberia said that it indefinitely postponed the timeline for finishing up merger talks with British Airways; chairman Fernando Conte said that Iberia should instead "concentrate on the reestablishment of its financial solidity." Yet it's interesting how the announcement came right around the time that British Airways announced a record loss and reports emerged about how the carrier is struggling with a pension plan deficit of at least £1.2 billion ($2 billion). BA CEO Willie Walsh has even said that the airline "is in a fight for survival."Hmm... coincidence?Probably not. Although talks between BA and Iberia are still continuing, it's clear that Iberia is starting to question the financial viability of its British partner, and so reports that it's looking for a future partner with stronger financial performance aren't surprising. Iberia's finance director, Enrique Dupuy, said Wednesday that Iberia can't hold its own against what he called airline "megagroups", namely, Air France-KLM and Lufthansa. "A merger with BA is a good fit for Iberia, but a merger with Lufthansa or Air France would be quite a good fit as well," Dupuy said. "We have spent a lot of time examining these alternatives, and of course they are not ruled out, perhaps the most attractive aim is British Airways but we also have very attractive alternatives."In a statement to The Airline Blog, Iberia's international press manager Santiago de Juan made clear that as of now, the only deal being negotiated is between Iberia and BA: "Mr. Dupuy said something Iberia has been saying for some time now, which is that Iberia wants to play an important role in the consolidation process the airline industry is going through. That means that Iberia has analysed the different possibilities for this consolidation process, Air France and Lufthansa included, but at this moment Iberia is in merger talks with British Airways and it is NOT in merger talks with [Lufthansa or Air France]." de Juan would not comment on whether Iberia's recent look at 'different possibilities' had anything to do with BA's financial trouble.


That's right - CCTV is reporting that Chinese carrier Spring Airlines is looking at standing-room only flights on some of its Airbus A320s. The airline, billed as the first low-cost carrier in China, will try to get regulatory approval for the idea by the end of the year. Apparently, the new passenger layout means that the A320s can fit up to 40% more passengers (that's quite a bit) as well as cut costs by 20%. "It's just like bar stools," the airline said. "The safety belt is the the most important thing. It will still be fastened around the waist."
Spring Airlines wants the standing-only flights as a way to cope with capacity issues - it can't get a hold of new planes quickly enough to keep up with passenger demand. According to Spring Airlines President Wang Zhengua, the idea for the flights was proposed by Chinese vice premier Zhang Dejiang: "He suggested that, for a lower price, passengers should be able to get on a plane like catching a bus, with no seat, no luggage consignment, no food, no water, but very convenient." Wang also says that airline has been told by Airbus that the idea was safe, so "once the government approves it formally, we'll try it."
Apparently the tickets that require you to stand in the aisle would be 20% cheaper. I'm not sure whether the entire aircraft would be standing-only, or if it's just additional standing in the aisle. But this might be a novel, if somewhat uncomfortable, way of dealing with the problem of undercapacity - that is, if it gets regulatory approval, as the Chinese aviation authorities still require that passengers are seated for takeoff and landing. Maybe Vice Premier Zhang can do something about it, but in the meantime, let's not give Ryanair's Michael O'Leary any ideas...


Those of you looking forward to getting married mid-air will have to wait; easyJet's request earlier this month to have its pilots be authorized to wed couples in flight was turned down. The Luton, UK-based low-cost airline, one of Europe's largest, claimed that it received many requests from couples seeking to tie the knot on board, and was aiming to be the first airline to offer in-flight weddings. But the Luton Borough Council axed the proposal, saying that "current law does not permit a civil marriage or civil partnership taking place on board an aircraft... But we would be happy to consider licensing easyJet's ground facilities at London Luton Airport.”easyJet's Andrew McConnell was less than pleased with the outcome. "We are of course very disappointed by this news. It would appear that faceless bureaucrats in windowless offices have scuppered the dreams of many who wished to get married in the air."


"Ever since jet engines have been roaring and guzzling Jet-A, kerosene-based refined petroleum, carbon emissions have been accumulating. Jet-Age progress has a price and with some estimates showing jet aircraft accounting for 11% of greenhouse emissions, it doesn't take a John Muir to discern that flying the friendly skies exacts a price on the environment," says a press release by the online 'guide to green living,' Greenopia, which has released a list of the top ten 'greenest' airlines in the US. Virgin America, thanks to its young fleet and other environmental efforts, came in first place. The airlines were scored in seven categories:
Fuel conservation (do airlines have electric-powered ground vehicles? do they frequently wash their engines, which improve their efficiency? do they have winglets on their fleet?)
Alternative fuel types (such as biofuels)
In-flight recycling (after all, all of those cans have to go somewhere)
'Green' food options in flight (listed by Greentopia as 'organic, local, natural, or fair trade')
'Green' buildings and terminals
Carbon offsets available for purchase
Fleet age (not necessarily a perfect indicator of how 'green' an airline is, but generally speaking, the younger the airplane, the more fuel-efficient it is)And the results:
Virgin America
Continental
Horizon
jetBlue
Southwest
Northwest
Delta
American
United
US Airways


It's easy enough to grumble about the service we get when we're flying, but the latest World Airline Awards show that - as the immortal Fred Dagg put it some 25 years ago - "we don't know how lucky we are, mate".
The verdict of the 16.2 million travellers who voted in the latest Skytrax survey of airlines is that New Zealand is served by the best airlines in the world.
For instance, the winner of the title of Airline of the Year for 2009 is Cathay Pacific, which has been flying into Auckland since 1983, and also won the top award in 2003 and 2005. It's pretty hard to disagree with that high rating because, in my experience, Cathay has never failed to deliver.
Of the top 10 airlines in the competition, eight fly here, namely: Singapore Airlines (2nd), Asiana Airlines (3rd), Emirates (5), Qantas (6), our own national carrier Air New Zealand (8), Malaysia Airlines (9) and Thai Airways (10). I've never flown Asiana but I have tried the others and they're all airlines I'd be happy to use again.
Perhaps more importantly, for the mass of us who travel steerage, the best economy classes in the world are provided by Asiana, Air NZ, Singapore and Malaysia (plus Qatar Airways, which doesn't fly here).
I'm sure opinions on this will differ but, in my experience, economy class travel has improved in the past couple of years after going through a period where it was purely a matter of cramming in as many people as possible. And I do think Air NZ has done particularly well in improving the economy experience.
The awards also indicate that if you can stretch your wallet to flying premium economy, then Air NZ is the best bet in this part of the world, having taken third place globally.
Or, if you can go even further and manage business class, then Singapore and Air NZ rate as the best around here.
The Skytrax survey also named Jetstar as the fourth best economy airline in the world, Malaysia as having the best cabin staff, Emirates provided the best inflight entertainment, Qantas was judged the best airline in Australasia and Air Tahiti Nui as the best airline in the Pacific, while Star Alliance was named the best airline alliance.


After a three-month effort to try and unionize the pilots of JetBlue, they did not have enough votes and the pilots remain union-less. Only 33% of the pilots voted for the union, where 50% was needed to approve the formation of a union. This might show a positive outlook of the JetBlue pilots that the main cooperation is able to hear and deal with their concerns now and in the future.
JetBlue, being able to remain union less since its inception in 2000 has allowed them to keep costs low and compete better against other airlines who have unions.
Although unions can surely help with securing competitive wages and benefits for employees, it seems that sometimes in the dire situations the airlines are in, they look out for more of their own interests and not the overall big picture of the airlines. If employees feel they can get what they want without having to form a union — that is probably a good thing!


One of my favorite airline liveries was the old USAir with the bare metal and gradients of red. Normally that doesn’t fit into liveries I normally like. I seem to not like designs on the metal fuselage, I don’t like having a cheat line of any sort and red is not one of my favorite colors. However, for some reason when pulled together it worked. I wasn’t so thrilled with the livery after this one.


Last September an Aeroflot-Nord Boeing 737-500 crashed and killed all 88 on board. The final report released today shows that the pilot lost “spatial orientation”, banking the plane on its left wing, causing rapid decent into the ground.
It seems the pilot had been overworked, drinking alcohol, and not trained well on the Boeing’s altitude indicator as he should. All Boeing 737 flights have been suspended until additional training can be had by the pilots.
After the crash Aeroflot severed links with Aeroflot-Nord and required they remove all the company branding — probably a very smart move considering what happened.


I notice I seem to avoid having to write about stories in the news that aren’t so positive in the airline business. I know those of us interested or that work in this business hate to see when a plane goes down and lives are lost.
Flight 3407, a Bombardier Dash 8 Q400, crashed at about 10pm on February 12th. It crashed into some houses, killing a 61-year old man who was home at the time and all 48 people (44 passengers, 4 crew) that were aboard the plane.
It appears at this point the plane lost forward momentum and came down flat on its belly. Some indicators are pointing to icing that was reported before the crash.
Even though ice could turn out to be the main factor of this, the Dash 8 is well known to handle the ice well and ability to get through almost anything. From what is reported now, it seems this accident happened very quickly, giving very little opprotunity for the pilots to save the doomed plane.
My thoughts go out to the families of those affected by this tragic loss.


If you have been following the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, you have probably been pretty frustrated with the delays. I always love the day when a new airliner is able to come out of the hanger, taxi out, and fly. Boeing says the Dreamliner is on target (well the newest target) to start deliveries in the first quarter of 2010. This sounds of good news, but deliveries were supposed to start in May 2008.
They have had delays from parts, production “glitches” and of course that 2-month strike. Then add to all of that the global economic downturn and people flying less, creating a smaller demand for new aircraft like the 787. Although the demand might be smaller, Boeing still has 878 orders from 57 different customers.


A cargo handler working for JetBlue decided to take a little nap at a bad time. He fell asleep in the planes cargo bin and didn’t realize what was going on until in the air. Lucky for him, the cargo hold was heated which allowed him to live to tell his tale.
He took the short flight from New York to Boston and after be determined it was all an honest mistake, he was allowed to return to New York. No word if he will be one of many people newly unemployed.


Sometimes I come across stories that are somewhat interesting, but don’t know how to approach the subject and I end up moving on. This is one of those that I almost did, but I can’t help but making a post about it.
Imagine for a moment you are on a flight from LA to Honolulu for a nice little scuba diving vacation. You are in the middle of your in-flight movie wasting the time away. Then your seatmate stands up next to you and…well…starts to urinate on you. Then you push him to get him to stop, but he keeps going.
I wish this was a crazy fictional story, but this happened to a 66-year old woman on Continental flight 3. A 28-year old, well intoxicated gentlemen (well I guess not so much of a gentlemen) either couldn’t make it to the bathroom or didn’t care. Some-what luckily there was an Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms agent behind this incident and was able to restrain the man.
He has now been sentenced to 3 weeks in prison and six months of probation after wards. This kind of story makes sitting next to a snoring person not too hard to handle!


British Airways Flight 38 crashed in Heathrow Airport in London in January 2008. Luckily no one died and only 13 of the 136 aboard had minor injuries. The flight landed 1000 feet short of the runway due to lack of thrust to the engines, probably caused from ice in the fuel lines.
Upon landing, the landing gear collapsed and caused quite a mess.
Since then, the aircraft has been kept intact while investigating the accident. Even though the investigation is not completed, permission has been given for the airframe to be “broken up” and “sent for recycling.”
It is quite interesting to think what will happen to the airframe and in what future products it might end up in.


If you read the main headlines of most new sources it seems the world might end soon with the Swine Flu outbreak. Although not as bad as the media hypes it, some are still concerned about travel. Because of this some airlines are waiving change fees for flights through Mexico.
It is estimated that about 1,600 have been infected and about 149 deaths in Mexico, and airlines don’t want to put people out for wanting to cancel or change their flights. The airlines that are offerring no change fees (with some restrictions of course):
- United Airlines- American Airlines- Mexicana Airlines- Continental Airlines- US Airways- Air Canada
Hopefully this will all be over soon!



Although it is frustrating at times, I understand when airlines have had to send jobs overseas to help them survive.
Delta, in a rare showing, is now doing the opposite — and at a good time nonetheless! They are no longer outsourcing their reservation call center to India and will be moving the jobs back to the US.
There will still be call centers in Jamaica and South Africa, but staffing would most likely be reduced there as well in the future.
When Delta outsourced their call centers to India in 2002, they estimated saving $25million per year, which is nothing to sneeze at.
However, customers made it clear they weren’t happy with the service they received from the call centers in India. “The customer acceptance of call centers in foreign countries is low, and our customers are not shy about letting us have that feedback,” said Richard Anderson, Chief Executire of Delta Airlines.
I would imagine the number of reservation calls has greatly decreased since 2002, with most people choosing to reserve tickets online.


PETA is well known for previous controversial advertisements showing the abuse to animals around the world. Their latest attempt is a proposal to put an ad on a US Airways aircraft that showed a seal next to blood-looking text stating, “Canada’s Olympic Shame – End the Seal Slaughter.”
No matter what you think about this topic, putting anything with “blood” on the side of a plane is not going to go over well. PETA wanted to put the ads on flights between the US and Canada in time for the 2010 winter Olympics in Vancouver, BC.
In February, US Airways also turned down an ad for PETA where they wanted to go after KFC for the way their treat their chickens.
Although in these hard economic times, it is hard for any airline to turn away extra money, I think US Airways probably made a smart decision.


It has been about a year since all these wonderous bag fees have started. Southwest (which I have called the “new frills airline” a few times already) has resisted any of these fees and keep all their prices pretty straight forward. Now they are saying they feel they have earned more money with having no fees, since customers are choosing Southwest over airlines that do charge fees.
However, other airlines are sticking to their fees with bringing millions more in in revenue. In fact more airlines are increasing and adding new fees.
Alaksa Airlines just announced they will start charging fees and US Airways will charge $5 extra if a passenger doesn’t pre-pay for baggage fees.
Personally, I understand the fees. I mean the airlines are hurting and people are willing to pay for them. However, it has become nearly impossible to do a true cost


Boeing 777 loses one engine, luckily it has two!
Yes! Another good story that could have turned much worse. A Boeing 777 lost an engine shortly after take off at Sea-Tac airport in Seattle, WA. Asiana Flight 271 took off heading to South Korea with 179 passengers and 16 crew.
Then, something none of us want to hear and see — a few loud explosions and flames coming out of the left engine. At this time, it is not known what happened, but we will be keeping a close eye on this story


When first seeing this livery, I thought it might be some new Russian airline — red star and all. However, it is an Australian and Singapore airline started in May 2004.


Where more and more liveries are going to mostly being white and not being unique, Vietnam Airlines has a gorgeous metallic blue livery

Southwest Airlines will now charge $25 for an unaccompanied minor and $25 for overweight or a third piece of luggage. They will also allow pets to fly and will charge a “pet fare” of $75. Up until last fall Southwest did not post a loss in 17 years, but it has had to post losses for the past three quarters, mostly due to their locked in fuel prices.
Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly stated, “We truly believe in setting the right customer expectation and not charging for those amenities that a customer would ‘expect’ to get for free.” He also points out that all other major airlines in the US already charge these fees.
Although it might be disappointing that Southwest is adding some minor fees, I think it can be understandable in the given airline industry climate

Cuts, cuts, cuts. Airlines cutting routes, planes, and people seem to dominate the airline news. However this cut, has a little positive spin to it.
In 2008 US Airways had to let go over 1,300 positions, something no company enjoys. With declining revenues, US Airways had to make additional cuts, but didn’t want to resort to laying off additional people. Instead, the airline is asking flight attendants to volunteer to take 4 to 16 months off to allow the airline to save some cash.
The airline currently has over 6,600 flight attendants among their 33,000 employees.
I wasn’t able to find anywhere if the employees would be paid, so I contacted the kind folks over at US Airways. They stated that the leave is an “unpaid furlough”, but “flight attendants will be able to keep their flight privleges during the furlough.”
US Airways are not the only ones talking about future job cuts. Air France is looking at 3000 cuts, Delta 2000, American 1600, and on and on.
Part of me wonders how many of these cuts are needed and how many are these just an opprotunity to eliminate people at a time where it is becoming more and more accepted to lay off large numbers of hardworking people.


Yes, that is a hummingbird helping this Caribbean Airlines Boeing 737. You might think a hummingbird is not strong enough to help the plane out, but by all logical science those birds should fly, but they still manage to do it.
The hummingbird image is a tip of the hat to the republic of Trinidad and Tobago, where it is known as “the land of the hummingbird”




The Airline Blog just covered how LAX is upping their tarmac safety, and just recently an incident at Logan International Airport showed how important safety is. A US Airways Airbus A320 was throttled up for takeoff from Boston to Phoenix when a construction vehicle decided to cross the runway. “It was a serious thing, a matter of seconds,” said spokesman Phil Orlandella.
The driver of the construction vehicle has been placed on leave and all construction work on the runways has been suspended until the FAA has completed a full investigation of the incident.
One cannot underestimate the damage that someone on the ground can cause. From not closing a cargo door properly to driving at the wrong place at the wrong time, inattention on the ground can cost lives.



Rep Dan Lipinski from Illinois feels it is a good idea for the TSA to have a uniform carry-on size regulation. He wants to limit the maximum size of a carry-on to 22″ x 18″ x 10″. It is not the size that is as disconcerting, as not allowing the airlines to make their own decisions and the total lack of need for this legislation
Each airline flies different aircraft, have different configurations and clientele with different baggage needs. The bill would require the TSA to enforce the rules (presumably during the security check process). Although TSA has made leaps and bounds with speeding up the security process, this could greatly slow it down. People would be having to take stuff out, trying to cram their bags through and of course having to leave the line to check in their bags and come back through.
CrankFlier points out that many low cost airlines have their “minimum size” larger than what Rep Lipinski is asking for, and legacy carriers are already meeting the requirements. The low cost carriers would have to cut what they already offer.
What is the real reason for this? I don’t see a safety issue here, I would like to see someone try to make a valid one. In fact this would decrease safety. The TSA would have to police bag-size instead of doing what they are trained and look for illegal items taken through security.
This seems like a waste of time and legislation that will really hold no benefit. If airlines want to get together to create their own standard carry-on size, that is one thing, but for the government to come in and require standardization seems unnecessary.
UPDATE: FlyWithFish.com has a great chart showing all the airlines and their bag size requirements.

Virgin Atlantic and British Airways have had a cold war going on for years, according to Sir Branson. Now he is taking advantage of British Airways’ admission of financial difficulty by urging the British government not to financially assist the legacy carrier. He states that British Airways is, “not worth much.”
Although Sir Branson might be trying to stir up trouble, British Airways is not in the best financial shape. British Airways’ CEO Willie Walsh has a self-imposed June 30 deadline which he calls, “a fight for survival.”
He recently asked all 40,000 employees to work up to four weeks without pay in an effort to keep the airline afloat.
Sir Branson, who founded the privately held Virgin Atlantic, obviously has much invested if British Airways fails. “We and others are standing by ready to take on their routes and runway slots at Heathrow if they get into serious trouble,” Sir Branson stated re-assuring the government their nation would still have a viable transportation network.
A British Airways spokes person calls Sir Branson’s comments as “fantasy.” The airline stated, “There are no talks with the Government and there will be no talks. We have opposed state aid and our position has not changed.” Both British Airways’s CEO Walsh and finance director Keith Williams have announced they will work for free during the month of July.
Even if British Airways pulls through and Branson is just in fantasy-land, it is never a good sign having an airline (or any company for that matter) asking its employees to work for free. In this economic time, nothing is impossible and it will be interesting to see how this plays out.


The Boeing 787 Dreamliner has not had very good luck.
It is Boeing’s newest jet made to be more economical and replace the aging Boeing 757 and 767’s.
The new aircraft was supposed to enter service in May 2008, but has hit a number of hurdles causing delay after delay. The aircraft had its official roll out on 07/08/07 (get it 7-8-7…cleaver), but it was just a pretty looking shell with almost no functionality (duct tape anyone?).
Delays have ranged from software issues, a strike, fasteners, contractors, supply chain and in-correct installations.
Everyone following the drama were hoping the Dreamliner’s would finally have its first flight on June 23, 2009 but it wasn’t meant to be. Boeing is now announcing that the newest delay, “stems from 18 points where the center wing box (11) meets the wingbox (12) on each side of the aircraft. The fix, once identified, will be installed on location. ”
A new airliner being developed and taking its first flight is a very exciting experience for anyone that follows the airline industry. It has been a long time since the Boeing 777 took its first flight (wow 1994) and I feel a personal connection to this project, since I live less than 15 miles from where the plane will take its first flight and I know people who have been working on the Dreamliner.
At this point, Boeing does not know when the first flight will happen, but check out FlightBlogger Jon Ostrower, who has minute by minute coverage of the events unfolding.


Ryanair announced they want to be rid of checked bags. Reading the blogosphere about this (mostly the comments), it seems fliers are upset they wouldn’t be able to check bags and will probably somehow get charged more.
But is this really thatcrazy? I think this concept will save Ryanair money which will in turn should save passengers money. Here are some reasons I think it might be a good idea:
#1: No need for ticket counters. If you can check in at home (and be charged for it no doubt) and you can’t check in bags, why do you need a counter? Maybe one or two customer service people (that you can pay to talk to) at the airport, but this means no counter rental, staff, equipment, etc.#2: No bag carrousel needed. If there are no checked bags, there is no need to have the carrousel. Not only does this save money but saves you a lot of time not having to wait for your bag.#3: No baggage personnel. Ryanair doesn’t have to pay people to take bags on/off the flight, drive them to the airport, etc.#4: No vehicles needed to transport luggage and no gas, insurance, upkeep on those vehicles.#5: Don’t have to pay for lost luggage. People can’t lose it if they don’t check it. The airline would have no need for customer service representatives for lost baggage, and they don’t have to pay to hunt it down, ship it, or return it.#6: Reduces the need for fuel. With the plane weighing less it would take less fuel to get from point A to B.#7: It works. Take a look at Horizon Air, they give you the option for “Ala Cart Service” where passengers can put bags on a cart before entering the plane, they put the bags in the cargo hold, and have them on a cart for you when you get off. It might be more difficult with a larger plane, but the concept can work.
Yes, there are some downsides to this, and they will lose checked baggage fees, but I think overall they will walk away with more money in the pocket and able to provide even cheaper fares.
Although many fliers complain when changes like this occur, their memory seems to be erased when they can see how much money they can save on an airline ticket. Right or wrong, good idea or bad, I am interested to see how this works out.
What do you think? Is this a good idea? Will it work? Will Ryanair pass on their savings?


In January Southwest’s mechanics’ union approved the airline to complete some of their maintenance work in El Salvador. Before the program starts, some Southwest dispatchers are raising concerns about their ability to handle the new international operations needed to get the aircraft to El Salvador.
Southwest states they are working with dispatchers making sure they are fully trained and point out there will be very limited number of the international flights.
With the ever increasing competition to provide lower fares, more airlines have been looking at outsourcing their maintenance work. No matter if one thinks this is a wise move or not, it is important to make sure the people in charge of getting the planes to El Salvador are properly trained to safely get them there, even if there are no passengers on board.


The cabin of the Boeing 737 has slowly evolved over the years, but Boeing feels it is time for a large upgrade. Starting in 2010, Boeing will upgrade their 737 interiors with what they are calling “Boeing Sky Interiors.”
Heavily based off the research for the Boeing 787 interior, the new 737 interiors will “give a better connection to the flying experience.” Passengers stepping into the new 737 will notice the soft blue lighting on the ceilings and larger window reveals, giving the sense of a larger cabin.
Along with the aesthetic benefits, the new layout employs several practical changes. The overhead bins will have more storage space and they are pivot hinged (much like the Boeing 777), allowing more head room and open space when closed. The reading light and call buttons have been redesigned to create less confusion and less unintentional calls, which will make the flight attendants happy.
The new Boeing 737 will also feature performance upgrades. Boeing is hoping to increase fuel consumption by 2% via a combination of airframe and engine improvements. 2% might not sound like much when you think about your personal automobile, but when a Boeing 737-900ER can hold over 7,800 gallons of fuel, 2% can make a huge difference.


Recently a Thomas Cook flight from Majorca to Newcastle asked its passengers to change seats to help balance out the flight. This didn’t disturb the passengers as much as why they were asked.
The rear cargo door was jammed and bags could only be placed in the front cargo hold. Additionally while waiting to board their flight, passengers could overhear the de-boarding passengers talking how that they just experienced one of the worst flights ever.
Seventy-one of booked passengers didn’t want to press their luck and decided to find other options. Dave Charlton, one of the 71 talked about the passengers who de-boarded before he was supposed to get on, “People were kissing the ground and putting their hands together like they were praying. When people are getting off the plane saying ‘Don’t get on’ and we’d been told there was a fault with [the airplane], there was no way we would get on.”
An airline spokes person stated, “It is standard for all airlines to ensure cargo and passengers are evenly distributed on an aircraft and there will be times when passengers will be asked to move to the front or back of a plane. This is a routine procedure and poses no safety issue. We are disappointed that despite reassurances from the captain and crew, several passengers decided not to travel.”
Although the distribution of weight is a standard and normal procedure (I have been asked to do so on more than one flight), having a jammed door and fearful passengers is not quite normal procedure. There has been more than one flight that has dealt with cargo door issues with negative outcomes. Currently the airline is not providing any compensation and still treating the situation as the passengers are only upset they were asked to change seats.

free counters