New start-up airline JetAmerica has attracted a lot of attention recently, and not all of it has been positive. Sure, the flying public (and Jay Leno) have been talking about the airline's much-promoted $9 fares, but some have been doubtful of JetAmerica's business strategy. I figured that it would be a good thing to let someone with ties to JetAmerica to have an opportunity to elaborate on the airline's plan for the future.As head of World Satellite Television News and Media Relations, JetAmerica's official media relations firm of record, Bryan Glazer is JetAmerica's spokesperson. He has many years of experience with the airline industry, having previously worked with clients such as Virgin Atlantic and jetBlue. He also reported on airline-related news stories for various television news outlets. I recently had the opportunity to talk with Glazer about JetAmerica; a transcript of our conversation (edited for brevity and clarity) is below.Let’s start with the current business climate. With a weak economy and rising oil prices, now is definitely a challenging time to be starting an airline. How will JetAmerica succeed where others haven’t been all too successful? The climate is really good for a startup air carrier. The reason that I say that is, you have all the major carriers that are cutting back on services; cutting back on flights, [and] in some cases increasing fares and continuing to increase additional expenses for baggage, etc. We’re going into markets where there is no competition on these routes.If you take a look at the routes from South Bend, Lansing, Toledo, and Melbourne, Florida, into the New York metropolitan area, into Newark Airport, the people in these communities have, for years… been forced to fly on cramped turboprop planes and regional jets. They’ll have to endure very long layovers and arrive at their destinations anywhere from 7 to 10 hours later on a flight that should take under 2 hours in most cases. So we’re really not faced with competition. These routes are being served by major carriers, but they’re not getting any big jet service... [With the major carriers] they’re looking at round trips that, in many cases, start at $500.In other words, you’re not looking at going head-to-head up against the big guys?No, we’re not, because they are not running on these routes at all. They are, but they’re [flying] small turboprop planes and regional jets...Some people have been scratching their heads over JetAmerica’s decision to have Toledo as a hub… there just doesn’t seem to be that big of a market there, at least in terms of O&D traffic. Well, actually, if you take a look, statistically, people who live within a 75-mile radius of an airport will drive that far to get to an airport. We’re looking at a population base of approximately five million people in a radius of 75 miles from Toledo. The enplanement numbers specifically show that approximately a million customers a year... within that 75-mile radius fly from either Toledo Express [Airport] or Detroit Metro [Airport] to the New York metropolitan area. When I say they’re flying out of Detroit Metro, it’s because they choose to drive that far, or they’re taking the puddlejumpers and doing the connections through Detroit with Northwest or O’Hare with American.The population base and the enplanement numbers do exist to substantiate why we can fly from Toledo to Newark… It’s more about, are you willing to get on a puddlejumper, pay $500 for round-trip airfare with 21 day advance notice or as high as $1100 at the last minute as opposed to paying anywhere from $9 to $199 on JetAmerica… You really need to look at the big picture, which is, take a compass, twist it around 360 degrees, and look at what’s there, and in each case [referring to South Bend, Lansing, and Melbourne], you’re looking at 5 million people.It’s been said that you’re using the Ryanair model as a basis for JetAmerica. To what extent do you plan on applying that model? In many ways, we’re mimicking the business model of Ryanair. Ryanair is the most successful airline in the world. The reason that is is because they’re using Boeing 737 jets; they’re not using 747s, for example. These jets have long range and short range capabilities. And the airports that Ryanair primarily serves, although it’s branched into larger ones, are secondary airports that have huge population bases that, again, would normally have to connect to larger airports... Ryanair is an a-la-carte airline, where you pay for everything; same on JetAmerica.The only difference is that we will never have pay toilets on our planes; Ryanair is seriously talking about that. JetAmerica is not looking at a pay toilet situation… We’re an a-la-carte air carrier, but we’re going to draw the line on what is acceptable and unacceptable. Pay toilets are unacceptable. We do look at what you’re getting for your $9; you have to pay service fees, the September 11 fee, the taxes, the “convenience” fee to book online or to call reservation agents. When all is said and done, the reality is, $9… ends up being $25. It’s still quite a bargain.JetAmerica’s flights will be operated by Miami Air. Are there any plans to have JetAmerica operate its own aircraft with its own crew?There are no immediate plans… that say that we’re going to purchase aircraft. We have a very conservative business model, which is, why buy an airplane when the market is flooded with relatively new, clean, mechanically problem-free aircraft? Why buy it?... Why have the problems of owning an aircraft that cost $50 million and getting the financing, when you can simply outsource, or subcontract, an aircraft from a very reputable outfit like Miami Air... Miami Air services some of the best-known NFL, NHL, MLB teams. They’re not going to be putting their multi-million dollar players on DC-3s that don’t operate. Miami Air has an excellent reputation; they’ve been in business for 16 years… and the owner of the company makes sure that the oil is changed and the sparkplugs are changed on those airplanes every night. Those airplanes are probably better maintained than other aircraft out there today.I point to somebody like Allegiant that’s running MD-80s… some of these aircraft are twenty years old. Granted, Allegiant is the most profitable airline in the US right now, but who wants to ride on those planes? Maybe the leisure traveler who’s willing to get from point A to point B on a Greyhound bus. We’re not a Greyhound bus, we’re an a-la-carte carrier, and so subcontracting is a really good idea.You mentioned Allegiant Air… They’re an airline that has taken up point-to-point flying, somewhat similar, I think, to what JetAmerica is looking at.Right, they’ve applied the Ryanair model, same concept.And so, do you think that JetAmerica can become similar to Allegiant Air?I wouldn’t even make that distinction. I mean, Allegiant Air is a completely separate animal. But there are some similarities in the business model... [But] in terms of analogies, you’re comparing apples to oranges. We’re running 737s and they’re running MD80s. Totally different animal.Allegiant Air’s success has, in part, to do with the fact that it serves leisure markets, like Las Vegas and Florida. Taking a glance at JetAmerica’s initial route map, there don’t seem to be as many cities that leisure travelers might want to visit on vacation...I agree with you, but let’s take a look at the points where they’re going. First, they’re going to New York, so we’re going to New York… we’re [also] servicing central Florida and the I-95 corridor, as far north as Daytona and as far south as West Palm Beach [via Melbourne]. We’re not currently flying to Las Vegas, which is a very appealing destination for many people, and the Las Vegas economy’s not doing that well these days too… We’re going to be bringing onboard more aircraft every quarter with the concept of having at least twenty jets by the year 2010. If you look at where are our future focus cities are, if they should come to fruition, these are all underserved markets.One of the great things about these underserved markets is that they have small community air service grants. You can actually go ask an airport, like Melbourne, Lansing, South Bend, and Toledo, to help you fund your start-up air carrier. And in this particular case, the small community air service grants are given by the Department of Transportation to these airports to entice big jet air travel for their communities.Speaking of the subsidies…Not subsidies, grants. Big difference; these aren’t tax dollars, they’re grants.So the grants, then, that JetAmerica is getting, in the form of lowered airport fees and assistance in advertising and marketing… How essential are those to the JetAmerica business plan? In other words, how reliant is JetAmerica on those grants?We’re reliant on the airports to help us with marketing, and waiving their landing and takeoff fees. That’s pretty substantial; at some of these airports, that’s above a quarter of a million dollars. Startups can go to the airports and say, help us with our advertising and public relations and marketing campaigns. Right now we’ve got spots out there that have been produced, and the airports are placing them in their local markets. They’ll probably be more inclined to spend more of their small community air service grants once we have an airplane and we’re up in the air, which will happen on July 13th....Toledo has had its [grant] money sitting since 2006 and it’s decided not to use it until [JetAmerica] came aboard. Michael J. Stolarczyk, who is the president and CEO of the Toledo Port Authority, and he’s the one… who went looking for an air carrier to service his market. He went on LinkedIn and found different airline executives and approached them, and that’s how he found John Weikle… He knew that people in his community wanted non-stop air service to New York and Florida… You can’t run an air carrier on small community air service grants… you can get some seed money, and some waivers, but they aren’t going to last forever.One last question: I’m sure that you have encountered your own fair share of doubters and naysayers who are pessimistic about JetAmerica’s long-term survival. What do you have to say to them?I have seen consultants make forecasts that say that we have a good shot because we’re a start-up and we’re coming in at a time when there are a lot of cutbacks. I’ve seen naysayers that say that we wouldn’t have a chance. We’re going to take a roll of the dice here; we have a calculated crap shoot, meaning that the odds are with us, not against us. The ‘house’ is the ‘big boys,’ and they’re not going to win. They’ll do everything to prevent us from winning. United Airlines was quoted as saying, Chicago is our home, and we’re going to do everything to protect that. Continental Airlines is going to do everything to protect Newark Airport.We’re not as heavily financed as jetBlue, but we have a niche market, and that’s all we’re looking for. I’m sure people said that about Allegiant; they certainly said it about Southwest, when it came about; they said it about just about every start-up. Some have come and gone. The odds are on our side. This is a calculated crap shoot; this is not a spin of the wheel. The odds are with us.


I really can't remember the last time that I heard some good news regarding United Airlines, at least in terms of financial performance. Let's see here... good news, good news, good news... can't think of any. If you can, please do let me know.In his blog post What a Difference a Decade Makes on the Wall Street Journal's website, Scott McCartney rounded up a few interesting statistics that looked at United and Southwest - both today, and ten years ago. United has dropped from the largest airline in the US to the third-largest; its North American passenger traffic for the first five months of 2009 is down 26% from the first five months of 1999. Between 2000 and 2008, the airline's fleet as been cut by a third; its passenger numbers have dropped 38% and its workforce has been cut in half. In the last ten years, the airline has also had to deal with one of the largest Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings in American corporate history.So the news about United has been pretty bad for the last ten years, and there's no sign of that changing. Even though it tried to strike an upbeat tone with the recent news that it was shopping around for new planes, the recent financial numbers that it has posted are pretty ugly - if you've got shares in United Airlines, the numbers are likely to make your teeth start itching. Traffic fell a whopping 12.3% in May, and the airline expects the amount of money that it makes for every mile that a seat flies (also known as 'unit revenue') to drop 18 to 19 percent this quarter, compared to a year ago.And Fitch downgraded United's debt ratings, saying that its "credit profile is likely to weaken further, as extreme pressure in the revenue environment continues to undermine the positive cash flow impact of lower jet fuel prices in 2009." United's "heavy exposure to premium business markets" means that it's been hit particularly hard by the cutback on corporate travel spending.But perhaps the most visible sign of United's financial distress came when TV host Jim Cramer blasted CEO Glenn Tilton on his show, Mad Money, saying that Tilton belongs on the CEO 'Wall of Shame' because United's abysmal stock performance is awful, even for an airline. The airline's shares have lost 88% since it left bankruptcy back in 2006, and are down 63% just this year.Nobody's really predicting the imminent death of United, nor are they saying that the airline is likely to file for Chapter 11 a second time. And when the entire industry is facing its worst crisis since, well, the last major crisis a few years ago, it's unfair to think that United is going to start posting a profit or something. But the results that UAL has been posting have been significantly worse than the industry averages. United's got some strong assets - a sturdy, if somewhat tarnished, brand name; membership in the Star Alliance; some good international routes. But there's always been gloom-and-doom talk about how a big US carrier needs to fold in order for the rest of the industry to return to profitability, and if United doesn't want to be 'that one,' it had better come up with a better plan for financial viability, and soon.


Seatguru.com has released the results of its 2009 survey of over 1600 fliers. Airlines were ranked based on the quality of their in-flight service (food, seating, and flight attendants). Unsurprisingly, Singapore Airlines came out the clear winner, having the highest rating for flight attendant politeness, best food, and most comfortable business-class seats. British Airways also scored well in the flight attendants and food categories.American, United, and US Airways could definitely use an overhaul of their in-flight service; the three airlines were ranked as serving the worst food, having the worst economy-class seats (jetBlue had the best) and the rudest flight attendants (with United coming in dead last here). Nobody's saying that they have to become like Singapore Airlines, but surely a few improvements here and there might be a sound investment? After all, how many people choose to fly on one of the US legacy carriers because of service? With the possible exception of Continental, I'm betting that very few actually do. Most people buy a ticket on United or American or Northwest because of their route network, or maybe a good price that they managed to get. If one of those airlines improved its in-flight product above its competitors - nothing drastic, necessarily, but maybe politer flight attendants, cleaner planes, and more comfortable seats, for a start - then maybe people would go out of their way to fly that airline. Just a thought.A few other interesting tidbits from the survey: fliers perceived international airlines to be safer than US domestic airlines, and more people felt safer in the front of the aircraft than anywhere else. 13% of fliers said that they had "knowingly transported banned items through security," although no examples of what these 'banned items' could be were provided. And "for those who didn't mind celebrity seatmates, preference went to the President & First Lady."


If you're not familiar with OpenSkies, it's the premium transatlantic brand that British Airways launched a year ago with some BA 757s, which fly in an all-business class configuration. It merged with French competitor L'Avion last July, and the process was completed in April. The subsidiary took advantage of the identically-named Open Skies treaty, which allows European Union airlines to fly from any EU country to the US.But The Guardian is now reporting that BA, faced with deepening financial troubles, is looking at shutting down or selling off OpenSkies. BA, which itself developed much of its product around catering to business travelers, has been adversely affected by the drop-off in business travel over the last year, and it's not unreasonable to think that OpenSkies, an all-business class airline, must be affected in the same way. "Every part of our business is under review in these difficult and challenging times," said a British Airways spokesperson. "Closing [OpenSkies] would have no material effect on our financial performance," said CEO Willie Walsh. "But the team there knows that it will close if it does not deliver on its business plan."The report conflicts with recent statements by Dale Moss, OpenSkies' managing director. "We are not on the business plan that we set out, but we are not far off - we are probably nine months off where we wanted to be at this particular time," he said. Moss stressed that despite the downturn in business travel, the airline will continue flying. More importantly, Moss said that OpenSkies will try to use its lower cost base to compete more effectively against its transatlantic competitors. But BA's operating in crisis mode, and if the operation isn't making money, then its future looks bleak. The fact that Walsh is publicly talking about giving OpenSkies the axe can't be a good sign.

Mark Malkoff is a New York comedian with a fear of flying, and has taken a pretty novel approach to confronting his fear: he's been spending the entire month of June living on a plane. Well, not just one, of course; he's been eating and sleeping on quite a few AirTran planes since the month began. He stays in touch with the rest of the world through Twitter and his website, MarkonAirTran.com, where he posts some pretty amusing videos he's taken on board. Last week, The Airline Blog had the opportunity to ask him a few questions:So first of all, why did you agree to do this? Did you approach AirTran or did they approach you?I got the idea a year and a half ago to stay on a plane for an entire month to get over my fear of flying. AirTran had liked my previous work. I wanted to do the project. We sat down and it immediately became clear it was a good fit.How much progress have you made in getting over your fear of flying?My fear has gotten tons better. If I started at a ten, I'm now at a 3. Talking to the AirTran pilots has really helped. Also, just flying 13 to 14 hours every day has gotten me used to it.What do you like best about living on the plane? And the worst?The best are the AirTran flight attendants, and the wifi when I'm up in the sky. I don't think I'd survive without the wifi. It allows me to keep in contact with friends, family, and people on Twitter. The worst is washing my hair in the airplane bathroom. Sleeping alone on the plane isn't fun, either.What do you mostly eat? Where do you get your food from?Nice people bring me food from the airport. I try to stick to fruit and vegetables. I take a lot of vitamins every morning.So far, what's the strangest experience you've had while living on an airplane?People taking my picture while I'm sleeping was strange. Also, a few times I was sleeping alone on the plane at night [when] it started moving, being pulled to another gate. The first time it happened, I wasn't told ahead of time. I was just happy it didn't take off.How difficult is it to keep track of where you're flying, and where you've already been?I never know where I am, where I'm going, and how many times I've been to a particular city. For instance, I thought I was in Milwaukee for the third time and it was the eighth.What are some of the little things that you do to try to keep some semblance of a 'normal' daily routine?I wake up, get clean, dress, brush my teeth, eat fruit, check my email, and then see what cities I'm flying to that day. I don't usually know until the day before, but all the cities kind of blend together.I saw the video of you getting showered down by the fire trucks at Flint airport. When you don't have the opportunity to do that, how do you keep clean?I use baby wipes and wash my hair in the airplane bathroom. It's not fun, trust me. Getting hosed down on the tarmac in Flint was the cleanest I've been in weeks.Is AirTran giving you frequent-flier miles? Do you get to keep them?I hope so! My wife flies with me on the weekends. AirTran threw us an anniversary dinner on the wing of a plane. It was kind of incredible. The videos are a lot of fun. Passengers love being a part of it. We put up new content every day at markonairtran.com. My favorites are bingo with passengers, a flight attendant washing my hair mid-flight, and [playing] Twister.


I can't think of a time when an airline company has purchased two airlines in as many days, but that's what has happened, now that Republic Airways Holdings has agreed to not only purchase Denver-based Frontier Airlines, but also long-struggling Midwest Airlines. If it wants to pull off the hat trick, then all it needs to do is purchase one more airline.
You might not have heard of Republic before - and that's not surprising, since the airline doesn't fly under that name but under three brands: Chautauqua Airlines, Shuttle America, and Republic Airlines. Still haven't heard of any of those? That's because they're the ones who do some of the flying for the regional airline brands, like United Express, Delta Connection, US Airways Express, AmericanConnection, and Continental Express. Republic Airways has been pretty successful, because of the increase in regional airline flying and the fact that their labor costs are relatively low (flight crews aren't as senior, meaning they aren't paid as much).
Under the terms of the first deal, Frontier, which has been stuck in Chapter 11 bankruptcy for more than a year, would walk out of bankruptcy court as a fully-owned subsidiary of Republic, but keep flying under its own name. Of course, the deal's not final yet - if another company places a higher bid for Frontier next month at a bankruptcy auction, or if the bankruptcy court turns the deal down, then the takeover wouldn't be completed.
Why did Republic go after Frontier? One scenario claims that Republic, which does some flying under the United Express banner, could turn around and sell Frontier's assets to United Airlines, which competes head-on with Frontier at Denver.
As for Midwest - well, let's just say that the writing's been on the wall for quite some time now. The airline is a sad shell of its former self - remember when they had all of those DC-9s and MD-80s and the nice seats and good food? Last year, Republic loaned Midwest $25 million - a lifeline that helped it stay out of bankruptcy, but one that by no means helped the overall financial situation. The airline fought off a takeover attempt by AirTran last year, but times have since gotten a lot more tough.
The airline was recently sued after falling behind on aircraft payments, and it would have had to have faced the prospect of going up against not only AirTran but now Southwest at its Milwaukee hub, so it's got to be pretty good for Midwest that Republic stepped in. The current plan is to have Midwest continue under its own brand name, just like Frontier, but the 717s will be ditched in favor of Embraer 190s.

free counters